12 tests a longevity check-up orders
ApoB, Lp(a), fasting insulin, calcium score. The basic check-up rarely includes these twelve, and they are the markers that most predict health trajectory over the next twenty years.

Patrícia came to the office last week with a folder. Inside, the results of a basic check-up she had done at a lab chain: complete blood count, kidney function, basic lipid panel, fasting glucose, TSH, urinalysis. Fifty-two lines in total.
Missing: ApoB. Missing: Lp(a). Missing: fasting insulin. Missing: transferrin saturation alongside ferritin (the latter was there, isolated). Missing: coronary artery calcium score.
The folder was thick. But, in my way of reading it, the questions that matter most for her future went unanswered.
The basic check-up answers one question. I ask another.
The conventional check-up was designed for a specific and legitimate question: do you have any disease established today? Complete blood count, kidney function, basic lipid panel, glucose, urine, thyroid. These tests remain essential, and I keep ordering them. They work as the background of care.
The question that organizes preventive care in my office is another: where is the patient's health headed in the next twenty years? To answer it, I add a layer with greater predictive power: number of atherogenic particles, early insulin resistance, subclinical inflammation, ovarian reserve, coronary plaque already present in ascending curve.
It is not a question of "doing more" or "doing less." It is of doing what matters — a habit I formed during my nephrology residency at Santa Casa de Londrina, where I learned early to interrogate any test before signing the order.
The list that follows does not replace consultation. Each test may be indicated or contraindicated depending on context: age, sex, family history, symptoms. But it gives an axis for the conversation worth having.
The 12 tests that change the reading
1. ApoB (apolipoprotein B). Measures the number of atherogenic particles in circulation: every LDL, IDL, VLDL, and Lp(a) carries one ApoB molecule. The Sniderman, Navar, and Thanassoulis review published in 2022 in JAMA Cardiology synthesized decades of literature showing that ApoB is a better predictor of cardiovascular events than LDL-C or non-HDL cholesterol, especially in cases of discordance (which are common in metabolic syndrome and diabetes). General target: <90 mg/dL for low risk; <80 for moderate-high risk; <65 for secondary prevention.
2. Lp(a) — lipoprotein(a). Hereditary, measure once in a lifetime (after age 18). About 20% of the population has Lp(a) above the risk threshold. The Tsimikas review in JACC in 2017 establishes Lp(a) as a causal and independent risk factor for coronary disease and calcified aortic stenosis. Target: <50 mg/dL (or <125 nmol/L). Above that, cardiovascular management changes, even with "normal" LDL.
3. Fasting insulin + HOMA-IR. Detects insulin resistance years before glucose climbs. Insulin <8 µIU/mL is desirable; >12 suggests resistance; >20 is already serious. HOMA-IR <2.0 is the clinical target.
4. HbA1c. Average glycation over the last 90 days. ADA 2026 criteria: <5.7% normal, 5.7–6.4% pre-diabetes, ≥6.5% diabetes. More useful than isolated fasting glucose, which captures only one instant.
5. High-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP). Low-grade inflammation, an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Target <1.0 mg/L. Between 1.0 and 3.0, intermediate risk; >3.0, high risk. I always read it alongside acute conditions ruled out (infection, recent injury).
6. Ferritin + transferrin saturation. Together, not isolated. Ferritin alone can mask functional deficiency or be falsely elevated by inflammation. For menstruating adult women, ferritin below 50 with symptoms generally already requires action.
7. TSH + free T4 + free T3. TSH alone misses central dysfunction and altered conversion. This trio gives the full reading of the axis.
8. Vitamin D (25-OH). Deficiency widely prevalent in Brazil even in sunny regions. Individualized target: 40–60 ng/mL for most adults.
9. Vitamin B12 + homocysteine. B12 alone may read "normal" (>200 pg/mL) with functional deficiency already established. Homocysteine >10 µmol/L suggests active deficiency of B12, B6, or folate. Important in vegetarians, the elderly, chronic users of metformin or proton pump inhibitors.
10. Total testosterone + free + SHBG (men). Total alone can mislead: those with high SHBG have normal total testosterone but low free testosterone, with real symptoms (fatigue, libido, loss of muscle mass). I order LH and FSH together if there is a hypogonadism picture.
11. Estradiol + FSH + progesterone (perimenopausal women). FSH is the most sensitive marker of declining ovarian reserve. Estradiol alone oscillates too much to be useful by itself. In those still menstruating, I draw in the follicular phase (days 3 to 5).
12. Coronary artery calcium score (CAC). Not a blood test, but it belongs on this list. Non-contrast CT, low radiation dose. Measures calcified atherosclerotic plaque in the coronaries. In men >40 and women >50 with intermediate risk, or earlier if there is an early family history, it is the test that most reorganizes the preventive conversation in my office. Done once; repeat in 5 years if zero, depending on management.
In the background of these twelve, always the complete blood count, kidney function (creatinine, urea, AST/ALT), urinalysis, and well-measured blood pressure — these are so basic they don't even count, but they remain indispensable.

The question I ask before each test
The question I ask before ordering any test, and that I teach every resident from my days coordinating the residency program, is simple: if the result comes back abnormal, what changes in management? If the answer is "nothing" or "I'd order another test to see better," that is not the right test at the right moment.
And the twin question: if the result comes back normal, what changes? If it is "nothing — I'd still investigate the same way," that is also not the right test.
Good tests answer concrete clinical questions and move decisions.
How I handle this in the office
In my consultation, the initial panel is not a catalog. I build it for the patient: age, sex, family history, chief complaint, risk factors. Annual and semi-annual tests enter a reading that evolves over time. The decision to order ApoB, Lp(a), CAC, or a complete hormone panel is born of clinical reading.
A well-chosen set of tests, added to the basic check-up already in your routine, is usually worth every penny. And it makes an enormous difference in what one sees — and in what one can change.
- Sniderman AD, Navar AM, Thanassoulis G. Apolipoprotein B vs Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol as the Primary Measure of Apolipoprotein B Lipoprotein-Related Risk: The Debate Is Over. JAMA Cardiol, 2022;7(3):257-258.
- Tsimikas S. A Test in Context: Lipoprotein(a): Diagnosis, Prognosis, Controversies, and Emerging Therapies. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017;69(6):692-711.
- Grundy SM et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/Multisociety Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol. Circulation, 2019;139(25):e1082-e1143.
- American Diabetes Association. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026. Diabetes Care, 2026;49(Suppl 1):S27-S49.
Clinical review. Medical content authored by Dr. Getúlio Amaral Filho · CRM-PR 21,876 · RQE 16,038 (Nephrology).
This content is educational and does not constitute medical prescription. Each case is unique — for individual evaluation and care, consult a physician.
Pre-diabetes is not a phase. It is a five-year window.
An HbA1c between 5.7% and 6.4% is usually treated as a vague warning — "let's repeat it in a year." The literature is more uncomfortable: every year without action increases the probability of progression and narrows the window in which reversal is still the most likely outcome.
Lp(a): the test your father's cardiologist didn't order
One in five people has elevated lipoprotein(a). It is genetically determined, doubles or triples the risk of heart attack and aortic stenosis — and almost never appears on a checkup. Measuring it once in a lifetime changes decades of clinical decisions.
Ferritin between 30 and 100: the normality that drains women
The 'normal' stamp on a ferritin result is one of the most expensive errors in contemporary medicine. I have seen too many women pushed toward the psychiatrist with disabling fatigue — when the problem was the wrong ruler at the lab.